Review- Sherlock: The Abominable Bride

I’ve mentioned before how I love a good bromance (more on my months of Supernatural viewing later), and Sherlock Holmes and John Watson is one of the best.  If you haven’t watched Sherlock, the more modern BBC incarnation of the duo, I suggest you stop reading this post and catch up.  Also, here’s where I put the warning is that this post is going to contain hardcore spoilers for the most recent special, so if you are waiting to watch The Abominable Bride don’t read this post. I’ll be revealing the mystery and don’t want you yell-typing at me about spoilers.

The Mystery – In this one-off, special episode, a jilted corpse-like bride appears and takes her revenge on men who have wronged women.  Additionally we get a look at what’s going on in modern day London since we last left Sherlock as he used similarities from the Bride case to puzzle out how Moriarty could be back.

What I liked

Victorian England –  Sherlock turns inward and harkens back to an unsolved case from 100 years ago to work through issues in the present, and the majority of this episode takes place in a mental landscape of Victorian London.  As Sherlock gets closer to unraveling the case at hand, we are reminded of the reveal at the end of Series 3.  Despite seemingly blowing his brains out, Moriarty is back and Sherlock is summoned back from his exile (which seems to have been all of 4 minutes).

The reveal of the “Ghost” – This is a ghost story, and setting it in Victorian London does make it more fun and more spooky.  The show runners definitely play up the Gothic aspect of the story, complete with foggy hedge maze and haunted castle.  Of course ghosts aren’t real and the reveal of how the ghost bride came to be shows the perpetrators do an excellent job of using practical effects to terrify their victims.  By example famous effect “Pepper’s Ghost” is used.

Giving more attention to Sherlock’s drug problem and how Mycroft manages him –  Turns out the trip to Victorian England is not a place in Sherlock’s Mind Palace, but rather a drug induced hallucination he uses to try to figure out how Moriarty could have survived his self-inflicted headshot. Holmes’s drug use is well documented in the source material but hasn’t been explored too much in the BBC stories.  We also see a rare moment of caring between Sherlock and Mycroft where Sherlock makes good on an agreement he has with Mycroft and produces a list of the drugs he has taken.  While it seems Sherlock’s using cannot be stopped, it can at least be managed to the best of Mycroft’s abilities.

Molly as a man…. – When forensic scientist Hooper is introduced in this Victorian version, she’s a man.  However through John’s observations it’s made clear that Molly is still a woman, she is just presenting as a man for the sake of her career.  While the modern Molly has been growing in confidence, this “male” version is more brash, she snaps at underlings, and is much less taken with Holmes.  It was fun to watch.

I like Mary Morsten – The modern version of Mary is clever, strong, and can keep up with Sherlock and John, rather than being left behind to tend to home and hearth. Show runner Steven Moffat has received less than positive feedback on how he has handled women in the past, so this is a welcome change. While there is an attempt to sideline the Victorian version, it’s clear that Mary is her own woman, moving about society more freely than one would think.  (Fun fact- the actress who plays Mary, Amanda Abbington,  is the real life partner of Martin Freeman, who plays John Watson).

bride

What I didn’t like

Ultimate resolution of mystery – Despite being peppered with positive commentary on feminism, the villain(s) of this piece turn out to be women fighting for equality specifically in the form of the right to vote.

When Sherlock finds the group of women dressed in robes reminiscent of purple klansmen, chanting, and behaving like a stereotypical “secret society”.   These women, all “brides”, are the freedom fighters in the war for gender equality, a war spearheaded by an abused and martyred woman. This reveal definitely feels like show-runner Stephen Moffat responding to feedback that he has received about the portrayal of women in Sherlock.   But frankly, the response feels like a back handed compliment.  Here he spotlights women, but also basically makes them terrorists and murders.  What am I supposed to take from that?  The only way women can be heard is through terrorism?

While Sherlock man-splains the mystery he refers to the group of feminists as “A league of furies awakened, the women I, we, have lied to, betrayed,” “The women we have ignored and disparaged.”  And yet, here we have Holmes explaining their motive, and assigning his own labels.  Yeah it’s his show but even as he is explaining this is all caused by not letting women lead, or be independent, he takes away the ability for them to tell their own story for themselves.

7lbs in a 5lb sack–  Maybe it’s because it’s harder to get the actors together, but this episode felt quite bloated and unclear of the story it wanted to tell.  Did it want to tell the story of the Bride, or did it want to further explore the relationship and obsession between Sherlock and Moriarty?  Because ultimately the whole Bride story was a tool for Sherlock to explore Moriarty’s alleged return.  Wait, did that whole Bride story-line just get fridged?  So much for “The women we have ignored and disparaged.”

Conclusion

All in all I enjoyed this, and the “Inception-esque” storyline improved with a second viewing.  The friendship between Holmes and Watson remains delightful, but I think perhaps going back to the basics of the first two series might not be a bad idea.  The mysteries and the relationships are what makes Sherlock an enjoyable watch.  It doesn’t need to be overly complicated in terms of the devices used to tell the story.  It doesn’t make the show seem more clever, but rather treats the stories like Sherlock treats the Brides.  It doesn’t let the story speak for itself.

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. itsthegoog

    Couldn’t agree more. I found the episode got confusing once they revealed it wasn’t just a one-off, on second viewing it did make more sense, but the show is falling into Moffat’s “Don’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” shtick, which is getting old for me.

    • swanpride

      The reveal is cleverer than most people realize…the whole point of the reveal is that Sherlock is adding all this dazzling nonsense which is purely in his mind because he likes to be dramatic. The whole speech about the way those woman are treated is basically about the way he himself treats females and he doesn’t explain it to any female, he acknowledges it to himself (we are still in his mind, after all). He even calls himself out that he likes to add all this nonsense. Take everything he added for dramatic effect away and you are left with a dying woman who decided to take revenge on the two men who wronged her the most with the help of her friends. No murder cult necessary.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s